OAKLAND, Calif. (AP) - Elon Musk’s attorneys took on with OpenAI in court Tuesday as a federal judge weighed the billionaire’s ask for a court order that would obstruct the ChatGPT maker from converting itself to a for-profit company.

U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers said it was a “stretch” for Musk to claim he will be irreparably harmed if she doesn’t intervene to stop OpenAI from moving forward with its shift from a nonprofit research study laboratory to a for-profit corporation.

But the judge likewise raised issues about OpenAI and its relationship with business partner Microsoft and said she would not stop the case from transferring to trial as quickly as next year so a jury can decide.

“It is plausible that what Mr. Musk is saying is real. We ´ ll discover out. He ´ ll sit on the stand,” she said.

Musk, an early OpenAI investor and board member, took legal action against the expert system business last year, first in a California state court and later on in federal court, alleging it had actually betrayed its founding aims as a nonprofit research lab benefiting the public good. Musk had actually invested about $45 million in the startup from its starting until 2018, his lawyer said Tuesday.

Musk escalated the legal disagreement late in 2015, adding new claims and defendants and asking for a court order that would stop OpenAI ´ s prepares to convert itself into a for-profit business more fully. Musk also added his own AI company, xAI, as a plaintiff.

Also targeted by Musk’s claim is OpenAI’s close business partner Microsoft and tech business owner Reid Hoffman, a former member who also sits on Microsoft’s board.

Gonzalez Rogers said she has a high bar for approving the type of initial injunction that Musk wants however hasn’t yet ruled on the demand. She did say she had “significant concerns” with two individuals connected to Microsoft on OpenAI’s board - Hoffman and longtime Microsoft executive Deanna Templeton, who was a “non-voting observer.”

“So you desire me to think that she was sitting there listening to all the conversations and not informing any person? What would the point be for her to sit there and listen to everybody, if not to communicate what she was listening? There would be no point for her to be there, which is why she actually must not exist,” she said.

Hoffman, a co-founder of LinkedIn, has actually been on Microsoft ´ s board considering that soon after the tech huge bought the task networking website. He stepped down from OpenAI’s board in 2023 to prevent disputes with his AI start-up, Inflection.

Templeton, who Musk likewise called as an offender, was included as a non-voting member of OpenAI ´ s board in the consequences of Altman ´ s ouster after Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella sought more stability on the board. But months later, she was dropped from the OpenAI board as U.S. antitrust enforcers were expressing concerns about such plans on business boards.

The judge has handled a variety of tech market cases including Apple’s fight with Epic Games, though she said Tuesday that Musk’s case is “nothing like” that a person. That case was likewise the last time she approved a preliminary injunction, in 2020, eight months before the case went to trial.

Then-President Barack Obama selected Gonzalez Rogers to the federal bench in 2011.

Tuesday’s hearing was initially set for January but was postponed after Musk’s lawyer Marc Toberoff said his home was destroyed in the Pacific Palisades wildfire.

Musk, who did not participate in the hearing, has declared in the claim that the business are violating the regards to his fundamental contributions to the charity. Judge Gonzalez Rogers called it a “stretch” to claim “irreversible damage” to Musk, larsaluarna.se and called the case “billionaires vs. billionaires.” She questioned why Musk invested 10s of millions in OpenAI without a written agreement. Toberoff said it was because the relationship in between Altman and Musk at the time was “built on trust” and the two were very close.

“That is simply a great deal of money” to invest “on a handshake,” the judge said.

OpenAI has said Musk ´ s requested court order would “incapacitate OpenAI ´ s company”and mission to the benefit of Musk and his own AI company and is based on “far-fetched” legal claims.

At the heart of the disagreement is a 2017 internal power struggle at the recently established startup that resulted in Altman becoming OpenAI ´ s CEO

. Emails divulged by OpenAI show Musk had also looked for to be CEO and grew disappointed after 2 other OpenAI co-founders said he would hold too much power as a significant shareholder and primary executive if the startup succeeded in its goal to attain better-than-human AI referred to as artificial basic intelligence, or AGI. Musk has actually long voiced issues about how sophisticated types of AI might threaten mankind.

Altman eventually succeeded in becoming CEO and has actually remained so other than for a duration in 2023 when he was fired and after that restored days later after the board that ousted him was replaced.

OpenAI has actually looked for wiki.tld-wars.space to demonstrate Musk ´ s early support for the concept of making OpenAI a for-profit company so it could raise money for bybio.co the hardware and computer power that AI needs.

Musk is not the only one difficult OpenAI’s for-profit shift. Facebook and Instagram parent Meta Platforms has asked California’s attorney general of the United States to obstruct it, and the workplace of Delaware’s chief law officer has said it is reviewing the conversion.

It was unclear Tuesday when the case might go to trial. Musk’s attorneys initially said they would be ready by June after some back-and-forth with the 2 sides the judge indicated it probably will not be till June 2026 at the earliest, but likely early 2027.

O’Brien reported from Providence, Rhode Island.

-------