A.gov site comes from a main federal government company in the United States.

Secure.gov websites utilize HTTPS A lock (Lock Locked padlock) or https:// suggests you have actually safely linked to the.gov site. Share sensitive details just on official, safe sites.

- About - The Chief law officer - Organizational Chart - Budget & Performance - History

• Privacy Program
  
  - Press Releases
• Speeches - Videos - Photo Galleries - Blogs
• Podcasts
  
  - Guidance Documents - Forms
• Publications
• Details for Victims in Large Cases - Justice Manual
• Business and Contracts
  
  - Why Justice? - Benefits
• DOJ Vacancies - Legal Careers at DOJ
  
  Utilities
  
  - About
• News - Internships
• FOIA - Contact
• Details for Journalists
  
  - About - title=” About” About
• The Chief law officer - Organizational Chart - Budget & Performance

- Privacy Program

- title=” News” News

• Press Releases
• Speeches
• Videos - Photo Galleries - Blogs
• Podcasts
  
  - title=” Guidance & Resources” Resources
• Guidance Documents - Forms
• Publications
• Details for Victims in Large Cases
• Justice Manual
• Business and Contracts
  
  - Employment
• Why Justice? - Benefits
• DOJ Vacancies
• Legal Careers at DOJ
  
  - Our Offices
• Find Aid
• Contact Us
  
  Breadcrumb
  
  1. Justice.gov
• Office of Public Affairs
• News
• Press Releases
• Superseding Indictment Charges Chinese National In Relation To Alleged Plan To Steal Proprietary AI Technology
  
  MENU News
  
  - All News - Blogs - Photo Galleries - Podcasts
• Press Releases - Speeches
• Videos
  
  Archived Press Releases
  
  Archived News
  
  Para Notícias en Español
  
  Superseding Indictment Charges Chinese National in Relation to Alleged Plan to Steal Proprietary AI Technology
  
  - Facebook
• X.
• LinkedIn.
• Email
  
  Note: View the superseding indictment here.
  
  A federal grand jury returned a superseding indictment today charging Linwei Ding, likewise understood as Leon Ding, 38, with seven counts of financial espionage and seven counts of theft of trade tricks in connection with an alleged strategy to take from Google LLC (Google) exclusive details related to AI innovation.
  
  Ding was initially arraigned in March 2024 on four counts of theft of trade secrets. The superseding indictment returned today explains seven classifications of trade tricks stolen by Ding and charges Ding with 7 counts of economic espionage and 7 counts of theft of trade tricks.
  
  According to the superseding indictment, Google hired Ding as a software application engineer in 2019. Between around May 2022 and May 2023, Ding submitted more than 1,000 special files containing Google personal details from Google’s network to his individual Google Cloud account, consisting of the trade secrets declared in the superseding indictment.
  
  While Ding was employed by Google, he covertly affiliated himself with 2 People’s Republic of China (PRC)- based innovation business. Around June 2022, Ding remained in conversations to be the Chief Technology Officer for an early-stage technology company based in the PRC. By May 2023, Ding had founded his own technology business concentrated on AI and artificial intelligence in the PRC and was serving as the company’s CEO.
  
  The superseding indictment alleges that Ding meant to benefit the PRC government by stealing trade tricks from Google. Ding presumably took technology associating with the hardware facilities and software application platform that permits Google’s supercomputing data center to train and serve big AI designs. The trade secrets contain detailed details about the architecture and performance of Google’s Tensor Processing Unit (TPU) chips and systems and Google’s Graphics Processing Unit (GPU) systems, the software application that permits the chips to communicate and execute jobs, and the software that orchestrates thousands of chips into a supercomputer capable of training and carrying out cutting-edge AI workloads. The trade secrets also pertain to Google’s custom-designed SmartNIC, a type of network interface card used to boost Google’s GPU, high performance, and cloud networking products.
  
  As declared, Ding circulated a PowerPoint presentation to employees of his technology business pointing out PRC national policies encouraging the advancement of the domestic AI market. He likewise developed a PowerPoint discussion containing an application to a PRC skill program based in Shanghai. The superseding indictment explains how PRC-sponsored talent programs incentivize individuals taken part in research study and advancement outside the PRC to transmit that understanding and research to the PRC in exchange for incomes, research study funds, laboratory space, or other rewards. Ding’s application for the talent program specified that his company’s item “will help China to have calculating power facilities capabilities that are on par with the international level.”
  
  If founded guilty, Ding deals with a maximum charge of ten years in jail and as much as a $250,000 fine for each trade-secret count and 15 years in jail and $5,000,000 fine for each economic-espionage count. A federal district court judge will identify any sentence after considering the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines and other statutory factors.
  
  The FBI is investigating the case.
  
  Assistant U.S. Attorneys Casey Boome and Molly K. Priedeman for the Northern District of California and Trial Attorneys Stephen Marzen and Yifei Zheng of the National Security Division’s Counterintelligence and Export Control Section are prosecuting the case.
  
  Today’s action was coordinated through the Justice and Commerce Departments’ Disruptive Technology Strike Force. The Disruptive Technology Strike Force is an interagency police strike force co-led by the Departments of Justice and Commerce created to target illicit stars, safeguard supply chains, asteroidsathome.net and prevent crucial technology from being obtained by authoritarian programs and hostile nation-states.
  
  A superseding indictment is simply a claims. All accuseds are presumed innocent up until tested guilty beyond a sensible doubt in a court of law.