U.S. Diplomacy
Since its starting in 1922, Foreign Affairs has been the leading forum for serious conversation of American foreign policy and international affairs. The publication has featured contributions from many leading global affairs professionals.

More Resources

- Feedback
- Institutional Subscriptions
- Gift a Membership
- About Us
- Events
- Issue Archive
- Advertise
- Audio Content
- Account Management
- FAQs
Spy vs. AI

ANNE NEUBERGER is Deputy Assistant to the President and Deputy National Security Adviser for Cyber and Emerging Technology on the U.S. National Security Council. From 2009 to 2021, she served in senior functional functions in intelligence and cybersecurity at the National Security Agency, consisting of as its very first Chief Risk Officer.

- More by Anne Neuberger
Spy vs. AI

How Artificial Intelligence Will Remake Espionage

Anne Neuberger

-.
Copy Link Copied. Article link: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/united-states/spy-vs-aihttps://www.foreignaffairs.com/united-states/spy-vs-ai. Copy


Gift Link Copied. This is a subscriber-only feature. Subscribe now or Sign in.


Create Citation Copied. Chicago MLA APSA APA. Chicago Cite not available at the minute. MLA Cite not available at the moment. APSA Cite not available at the moment. APA Cite not available at the moment


Download PDF. This is a subscriber-only function. Subscribe now or Check in.


Request Reprint. Request reprint permissions here.




In the early 1950s, the United States faced a vital intelligence difficulty in its growing competitors with the Soviet Union. Outdated German reconnaissance pictures from The second world war might no longer provide adequate intelligence about Soviet military capabilities, and existing U.S. security capabilities were no longer able to penetrate the Soviet Union’s closed airspace. This deficiency spurred an adventurous moonshot initiative: the development of the U-2 reconnaissance aircraft. In just a couple of years, U-2 objectives were delivering important intelligence, catching pictures of Soviet missile installations in Cuba and bringing near-real-time insights from behind the Iron Curtain to the Oval Office.

Today, the United States stands at a similar juncture. Competition between Washington and its rivals over the future of the worldwide order is intensifying, and now, much as in the early 1950s, the United States must benefit from its first-rate economic sector and ample capability for innovation to outcompete its enemies. The U.S. intelligence neighborhood should harness the country’s sources of strength to provide insights to policymakers at the speed these days’s world. The integration of expert system, particularly through big language models, offers groundbreaking opportunities to enhance intelligence operations and analysis, making it possible for the shipment of faster and more appropriate assistance to decisionmakers. This technological transformation features significant downsides, however, particularly as enemies exploit similar developments to uncover and counter U.S. intelligence operations. With an AI race underway, the United States must challenge itself to be first-first to gain from AI, first to safeguard itself from enemies who may utilize the technology for ill, and initially to utilize AI in line with the laws and values of a democracy.

For the U.S. national security community, the pledge and handling the peril of AI will need deep technological and cultural modifications and a determination to change the method companies work. The U.S. intelligence and military neighborhoods can harness the capacity of AI while mitigating its intrinsic dangers, ensuring that the United States maintains its competitive edge in a quickly progressing international landscape. Even as it does so, the United States must transparently communicate to the American public, and to populations and partners around the world, how the country means to fairly and safely use AI, in compliance with its laws and worths.

MORE, BETTER, FASTER

AI’s potential to revolutionize the intelligence community depends on its capability to procedure and examine huge quantities of data at extraordinary speeds. It can be challenging to examine large quantities of gathered data to produce time-sensitive warnings. U.S. intelligence services could utilize AI systems’ pattern acknowledgment capabilities to determine and alert human experts to possible risks, such as missile launches or military motions, or essential worldwide developments that analysts know senior U.S. decisionmakers have an interest in. This capability would ensure that important cautions are prompt, actionable, and relevant, permitting more effective actions to both quickly emerging hazards and emerging policy chances. Multimodal designs, which incorporate text, images, and audio, enhance this analysis. For example, using AI to cross-reference satellite images with signals intelligence could provide a detailed view of military motions, enabling much faster and more precise danger evaluations and potentially brand-new means of providing details to policymakers.

Intelligence analysts can likewise unload repeated and time-consuming jobs to makers to concentrate on the most fulfilling work: creating initial and deeper analysis, increasing the intelligence community’s general insights and performance. A good example of this is foreign language translation. U.S. intelligence firms invested early in AI-powered capabilities, and the bet has actually paid off. The abilities of language designs have actually grown increasingly advanced and accurate-OpenAI’s just recently launched o1 and o3 models demonstrated significant development in accuracy and reasoning ability-and can be used to much more rapidly equate and summarize text, audio, and video files.

Although obstacles remain, future systems trained on greater amounts of non-English data might be efficient in discerning subtle differences in between dialects and comprehending the significance and cultural context of slang or Internet memes. By depending on these tools, the intelligence community could concentrate on training a cadre of highly specialized linguists, who can be hard to discover, typically battle to survive the clearance process, and take a very long time to train. And of course, by making more foreign language products available across the right agencies, U.S. intelligence services would have the ability to faster triage the mountain of foreign intelligence they receive to choose the needles in the haystack that truly matter.

The value of such speed to policymakers can not be undervalued. Models can promptly sift through intelligence information sets, open-source details, and traditional human intelligence and produce draft summaries or initial analytical reports that analysts can then validate and improve, making sure the final items are both detailed and precise. Analysts might partner with an advanced AI assistant to overcome analytical issues, test concepts, and brainstorm in a collaborative style, enhancing each version of their analyses and delivering finished intelligence faster.

Consider Israel’s experience in January 2018, when its intelligence service, the Mossad, covertly got into a secret Iranian center and took about 20 percent of the archives that detailed Iran’s nuclear activities in between 1999 and 2003. According to Israeli authorities, the Mossad collected some 55,000 pages of documents and a further 55,000 files saved on CDs, consisting of pictures and videos-nearly all in Farsi. Once the archive was obtained, senior authorities put tremendous pressure on intelligence professionals to produce detailed assessments of its content and whether it indicated an ongoing effort to construct an Iranian bomb. But it took these professionals several months-and numerous hours of labor-to translate each page, examine it by hand for relevant content, and integrate that details into assessments. With today’s AI abilities, the very first two steps in that procedure might have been accomplished within days, maybe even hours, enabling analysts to comprehend and contextualize the intelligence rapidly.

One of the most interesting applications is the method AI could change how intelligence is taken in by policymakers, allowing them to interact straight with intelligence reports through ChatGPT-like platforms. Such capabilities would permit users to ask specific concerns and get summarized, relevant details from countless reports with source citations, assisting them make notified decisions rapidly.

BRAVE NEW WORLD

Although AI provides various benefits, it likewise positions significant new threats, specifically as adversaries develop comparable technologies. China’s developments in AI, especially in computer vision and security, threaten U.S. intelligence operations. Because the nation is ruled by an authoritarian program, it lacks personal privacy constraints and civil liberty securities. That deficit makes it possible for massive data collection practices that have yielded information sets of immense size. Government-sanctioned AI designs are trained on vast quantities of personal and behavioral information that can then be used for numerous functions, such as monitoring and wiki.vifm.info social control. The presence of Chinese business, such as Huawei, in telecoms systems and software application worldwide could offer China with ready access to bulk information, significantly bulk images that can be utilized to train facial recognition models, a specific concern in nations with large U.S. military bases. The U.S. nationwide security neighborhood need to consider how Chinese designs developed on such substantial information sets can give China a strategic benefit.

And it is not simply China. The expansion of “open source” AI designs, such as Meta’s Llama and those created by the French company Mistral AI and the Chinese business DeepSeek, is putting powerful AI abilities into the hands of users around the world at fairly affordable costs. A number of these users are benign, however some are not-including authoritarian programs, cyber-hackers, and criminal gangs. These malign actors are utilizing large language models to quickly create and spread out false and malicious material or to conduct cyberattacks. As experienced with other intelligence-related innovations, such as signals obstruct abilities and unmanned drones, China, Iran, and Russia will have every reward to share a few of their AI developments with customer states and subnational groups, such as Hezbollah, Hamas, and the Wagner paramilitary company, therefore increasing the hazard to the United States and its allies.

The U.S. military and intelligence community’s AI designs will end up being appealing targets for adversaries. As they grow more effective and main to U.S. national security decision-making, intelligence AIs will end up being critical nationwide properties that must be safeguarded against foes looking for to compromise or control them. The intelligence neighborhood need to buy developing protected AI models and in establishing requirements for “red teaming” and constant evaluation to protect against possible risks. These teams can utilize AI to imitate attacks, discovering potential weak points and establishing techniques to alleviate them. Proactive procedures, including collaboration with allies on and investment in counter-AI innovations, will be important.

THE NEW NORMAL

These obstacles can not be wished away. Waiting too long for AI innovations to completely mature brings its own threats