U.S. Diplomacy
Since its starting in 1922, Foreign Affairs has actually been the leading online forum for severe conversation of American diplomacy and international affairs. The magazine has featured contributions from lots of prominent global affairs specialists.

More Resources

- Feedback
- Institutional Subscriptions
- Gift a Subscription
- About Us
- Events
- Issue Archive
- Advertise
- Audio Content
- Account Management
- FAQs
Spy vs. AI

ANNE NEUBERGER is Deputy Assistant to the President and Deputy National Security Adviser for Cyber and Emerging Technology on the U.S. National Security Council. From 2009 to 2021, she served in senior operational functions in intelligence and cybersecurity at the National Security Agency, including as its first Chief Risk Officer.

- More by Anne Neuberger
Spy vs. AI

How Artificial Intelligence Will Remake Espionage

Anne Neuberger

-.
Copy Link Copied. Article link: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/united-states/spy-vs-aihttps://www.foreignaffairs.com/united-states/spy-vs-ai. Copy


Gift Link Copied. This is a subscriber-only feature. Subscribe now or Check in.


Create Citation Copied. Chicago MLA APSA APA. Chicago Cite not available at the minute. MLA Cite not available at the minute. APSA Cite not available at the moment. APA Cite not available at the minute


Download PDF. This is a subscriber-only function. Subscribe now or Check in.


Request Reprint. Request reprint permissions here.




In the early 1950s, the United States faced a vital intelligence challenge in its burgeoning competitors with the Soviet Union. Outdated German reconnaissance photos from World War II might no longer provide sufficient intelligence about Soviet military abilities, and existing U.S. surveillance capabilities were no longer able to penetrate the Soviet Union’s closed airspace. This shortage stimulated an adventurous moonshot initiative: the advancement of the U-2 reconnaissance aircraft. In just a couple of years, U-2 missions were delivering essential intelligence, recording images of Soviet rocket installations in Cuba and bringing near-real-time insights from behind the Iron Curtain to the Oval Office.

Today, the United States stands at a similar point. Competition in between Washington and its competitors over the future of the global order is magnifying, and now, much as in the early 1950s, the United States must benefit from its world-class personal sector and adequate capability for development to outcompete its foes. The U.S. intelligence community must harness the country’s sources of strength to provide insights to policymakers at the speed of today’s world. The combination of artificial intelligence, especially through big language designs, provides groundbreaking opportunities to improve intelligence operations and analysis, allowing the delivery of faster and more appropriate support to decisionmakers. This technological transformation includes considerable downsides, however, especially as enemies exploit comparable advancements to discover and counter U.S. intelligence operations. With an AI race underway, the United States should challenge itself to be first-first to gain from AI, initially to safeguard itself from opponents who may utilize the technology for ill, and initially to utilize AI in line with the laws and worths of a democracy.

For the U.S. national security community, fulfilling the guarantee and handling the hazard of AI will require deep technological and cultural changes and a desire to alter the way companies work. The U.S. intelligence and military neighborhoods can harness the capacity of AI while alleviating its intrinsic threats, making sure that the United States maintains its competitive edge in a quickly evolving global landscape. Even as it does so, the United States need to transparently convey to the American public, and to populations and partners around the globe, how the country intends to fairly and safely utilize AI, in compliance with its laws and worths.

MORE, BETTER, FASTER

AI’s potential to change the intelligence neighborhood lies in its capability to procedure and examine large quantities of data at extraordinary speeds. It can be challenging to evaluate big amounts of gathered information to generate time-sensitive cautions. U.S. intelligence services could leverage AI systems’ pattern acknowledgment capabilities to identify and alert human experts to potential threats, such as missile launches or military motions, or essential international developments that experts understand senior U.S. decisionmakers are interested in. This ability would ensure that critical warnings are timely, actionable, and pertinent, enabling more effective responses to both rapidly emerging dangers and emerging policy chances. Multimodal designs, which integrate text, images, and audio, enhance this analysis. For circumstances, utilizing AI to cross-reference satellite imagery with signals intelligence might offer a detailed view of military movements, enabling faster and more precise hazard evaluations and potentially new methods of delivering details to policymakers.

Intelligence analysts can likewise offload repetitive and time-consuming jobs to machines to focus on the most satisfying work: generating original and much deeper analysis, increasing the intelligence neighborhood’s total insights and efficiency. A good example of this is foreign language translation. U.S. intelligence firms invested early in AI-powered abilities, and the bet has paid off. The abilities of language models have actually grown significantly sophisticated and accurate-OpenAI’s just recently released o1 and o3 models demonstrated substantial progress in precision and thinking ability-and can be utilized to much more rapidly translate and summarize text, audio, and video files.

Although difficulties remain, future systems trained on higher amounts of non-English data could be capable of discerning subtle distinctions in between dialects and understanding the meaning and cultural context of slang or Internet memes. By depending on these tools, the intelligence neighborhood might focus on training a cadre of extremely specialized linguists, who can be tough to discover, often struggle to make it through the clearance procedure, and take a long time to train. And naturally, by making more foreign language materials available across the right agencies, U.S. intelligence services would have the ability to more quickly triage the mountain of foreign intelligence they receive to choose the needles in the haystack that truly matter.

The worth of such speed to policymakers can not be underestimated. Models can swiftly sort through intelligence information sets, open-source details, and standard human intelligence and produce draft summaries or preliminary analytical reports that analysts can then verify and fine-tune, making sure the end products are both detailed and accurate. Analysts could partner with an innovative AI assistant to resolve analytical issues, test ideas, and brainstorm in a collective fashion, enhancing each version of their analyses and delivering finished intelligence faster.

Consider Israel’s experience in January 2018, when its intelligence service, the Mossad, discreetly broke into a secret Iranian center and took about 20 percent of the archives that detailed Iran’s nuclear activities in between 1999 and 2003. According to Israeli officials, the Mossad gathered some 55,000 pages of documents and an additional 55,000 files kept on CDs, consisting of photos and videos-nearly all in Farsi. Once the archive was obtained, systemcheck-wiki.de senior officials positioned enormous pressure on intelligence specialists to produce detailed evaluations of its content and whether it pointed to an ongoing effort to build an Iranian bomb. But it took these experts several months-and hundreds of hours of labor-to equate each page, examine it by hand for relevant content, and integrate that details into evaluations. With today’s AI abilities, the very first two steps in that process could have been achieved within days, possibly even hours, permitting experts to understand and contextualize the intelligence quickly.

One of the most intriguing applications is the way AI might transform how intelligence is consumed by policymakers, allowing them to connect straight with intelligence reports through ChatGPT-like platforms. Such abilities would permit users to ask specific concerns and receive summed up, appropriate details from countless reports with source citations, helping them make informed decisions quickly.

BRAVE NEW WORLD

Although AI uses many advantages, it likewise postures substantial brand-new risks, especially as foes develop similar technologies. China’s advancements in AI, particularly in computer vision and security, threaten U.S. intelligence operations. Because the country is ruled by an authoritarian regime, it lacks privacy constraints and civil liberty securities. That deficit makes it possible for large-scale data collection practices that have actually yielded information sets of enormous size. Government-sanctioned AI models are trained on vast quantities of personal and behavioral information that can then be utilized for different functions, such as security and social control. The presence of Chinese business, such as Huawei, in telecommunications systems and software application around the globe might offer China with ready access to bulk information, especially bulk images that can be utilized to train facial acknowledgment designs, a particular concern in nations with large U.S. military bases. The U.S. national security community should think about how Chinese designs developed on such comprehensive information sets can provide China a strategic advantage.

And it is not just China. The expansion of “open source” AI models, such as Meta’s Llama and those developed by the French business Mistral AI and the Chinese company DeepSeek, is putting powerful AI abilities into the hands of users around the world at fairly inexpensive expenses. Much of these users are benign, but some are not-including authoritarian programs, cyber-hackers, and criminal gangs. These malign actors are using large language designs to quickly generate and spread false and harmful material or to carry out cyberattacks. As experienced with other intelligence-related technologies, such as signals obstruct capabilities and unmanned drones, China, Iran, and Russia will have every reward to share some of their AI developments with client states and subnational groups, such as Hezbollah, Hamas, and the Wagner paramilitary business, consequently increasing the threat to the United States and its allies.

The U.S. military and intelligence community’s AI designs will become appealing targets for adversaries. As they grow more powerful and main to U.S. national security decision-making, intelligence AIs will end up being crucial national properties that must be protected against foes seeking to compromise or control them. The intelligence community must purchase developing safe and secure AI models and in developing standards for “red teaming” and oke.zone constant assessment to protect against prospective risks. These groups can use AI to imitate attacks, discovering potential weak points and developing techniques to mitigate them. Proactive steps, consisting of collaboration with allies on and investment in counter-AI technologies, will be vital.

THE NEW NORMAL

These challenges can not be wished away. Waiting too long for AI technologies to fully mature carries its own dangers