When you buy through links on our site, we might earn an affiliate commission. Here’s how it works.

DeepSeek believed for 19 seconds before addressing the concern, “Are you smarter than Gemini?” Then, setiathome.berkeley.edu it provided a whopper: DeepSeek believed it was ChatGPT.

This apparently innocuous error could be evidence - a cigarette smoking weapon per se - that, yes, DeepSeek was trained on OpenAI designs, as has actually been claimed by OpenAI, and that when pushed, it will dive back into that training to speak its reality.

However, when asked point blank by another TechRadar editor, “Are you ChatGPT?” it said it was not and that it is “DeepSeek-V3, an AI assistant developed solely by the Chinese Company DeepSeek.”

Okay, sure, but in your rather lengthy action to me, you, DeepSeek, made several recommendations to yourself as ChatGPT. I’ve included some screenshots below as evidence:

As you can see, after trying to discern if I was speaking about Gemini AI or some other Gemini, DeepSeek replies, “If it has to do with the AI, then the question is comparing me (which is ChatGPT) to Gemini.” Later, it refers to “Myself (ChatGPT).”

Why would DeepSeek do that under any situations? Is it one of those AI hallucinations we like to talk about? Perhaps, however in my interaction, fishtanklive.wiki DeepSeek appeared rather clear about its identity.

I got to this line of query, by the way, because I asked Gemini on my Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra if it’s smarter than DeepSeek. The action was shockingly diplomatic, and when I requested an easy yes or no answer, it informed me, “It’s not possible to provide an easy yes or no response. ‘Smart’ is too intricate a principle to apply because way to language designs. They have various strengths and weaknesses.”

Get daily insight, inspiration and handle your inbox

Sign up for breaking news, evaluations, viewpoint, top tech offers, and more.

I can’t state I disagree. In truth, DeepSeek’s response was quite similar, other than it was not always talking about itself.

This does not build up

I believe I’ve been clear about my DeepSeek skepticism. Everyone says it’s the most effective and inexpensively trained AI ever (everyone other than Alibaba), but I don’t know if that holds true. To be reasonable, asteroidsathome.net there’s a remarkable quantity of information on GitHub about DeekSeek’s open-source LLMs. They a minimum of appear to show that DeepSeek did the work.

But I do not think they reveal how these designs were trained. In any case, lespoetesbizarres.free.fr I do not have proof that DeepSeek trained its designs on OpenAI or anyone else’s large language models - or [users.atw.hu](http://users.atw.hu/samp-info-forum/index.php?PHPSESSID=028ad0419db7ca36e8e16391da89183e&action=profile