U.S. Diplomacy
Since its starting in 1922, Foreign Affairs has actually been the leading forum for serious discussion of American foreign policy and international affairs. The magazine has included contributions from many prominent worldwide affairs experts.

More Resources

- Feedback
- Institutional Subscriptions
- Gift a Membership
- About Us
- Events
- Issue Archive
- Advertise
- Audio Content
- Account Management
- FAQs
Spy vs. AI

ANNE NEUBERGER is Deputy Assistant to the President and Deputy National Security Adviser for Cyber and Emerging Technology on the U.S. National Security Council. From 2009 to 2021, she served in senior functional functions in intelligence and cybersecurity at the National Security Agency, consisting of as its very first Chief Risk Officer.

- More by Anne Neuberger
Spy vs. AI

How Artificial Intelligence Will Remake Espionage

Anne Neuberger

-.
Copy Link Copied. Article link: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/united-states/spy-vs-aihttps://www.foreignaffairs.com/united-states/spy-vs-ai. Copy


Gift Link Copied. This is a subscriber-only feature. Subscribe now or Check in.


Create Citation Copied. Chicago MLA APSA APA. Chicago Cite not available at the moment. MLA Cite not available at the moment. APSA Cite not available at the moment. APA Cite not available at the minute


Download PDF. This is a subscriber-only feature. Subscribe now or Check in.


Request Reprint. Request reprint authorizations here.




In the early 1950s, the United States faced a vital intelligence difficulty in its growing competitors with the Soviet Union. Outdated German reconnaissance photos from The second world war could no longer offer sufficient intelligence about Soviet military capabilities, and existing U.S. monitoring abilities were no longer able to permeate the Soviet Union’s closed airspace. This shortage stimulated an adventurous moonshot effort: the advancement of the U-2 reconnaissance aircraft. In only a couple of years, U-2 objectives were delivering vital intelligence, recording pictures of Soviet missile setups in Cuba and bringing near-real-time insights from behind the Iron Curtain to the Oval Office.

Today, the United States stands at a comparable point. Competition in between Washington and its rivals over the future of the order is magnifying, and now, much as in the early 1950s, the United States need to benefit from its first-rate economic sector and sufficient capacity for development to outcompete its adversaries. The U.S. intelligence neighborhood must harness the country’s sources of strength to deliver insights to policymakers at the speed of today’s world. The combination of artificial intelligence, particularly through large language designs, uses groundbreaking chances to enhance intelligence operations and analysis, making it possible for the shipment of faster and more relevant assistance to decisionmakers. This technological revolution features considerable drawbacks, however, particularly as adversaries make use of similar developments to discover and counter U.S. intelligence operations. With an AI race underway, the United States need to challenge itself to be first-first to gain from AI, initially to secure itself from opponents who might use the technology for ill, and first to utilize AI in line with the laws and worths of a democracy.

For the U.S. nationwide security neighborhood, fulfilling the promise and handling the hazard of AI will need deep technological and cultural changes and a determination to alter the method agencies work. The U.S. intelligence and military neighborhoods can harness the capacity of AI while reducing its fundamental dangers, making sure that the United States maintains its one-upmanship in a rapidly evolving international landscape. Even as it does so, the United States should transparently communicate to the American public, and to populations and partners worldwide, fraternityofshadows.com how the nation intends to fairly and safely utilize AI, in compliance with its laws and values.

MORE, BETTER, FASTER

AI’s potential to revolutionize the intelligence neighborhood lies in its capability to process and analyze huge quantities of information at unmatched speeds. It can be challenging to evaluate big amounts of collected data to produce time-sensitive cautions. U.S. intelligence services might leverage AI systems’ pattern recognition capabilities to recognize and alert human analysts to possible risks, such as missile launches or military motions, or essential international developments that experts know senior U.S. decisionmakers are interested in. This capability would make sure that critical warnings are timely, actionable, and appropriate, permitting more efficient reactions to both quickly emerging risks and emerging policy opportunities. Multimodal designs, which integrate text, images, and audio, boost this analysis. For example, utilizing AI to cross-reference satellite imagery with signals intelligence could provide a detailed view of military movements, allowing quicker and more precise threat evaluations and possibly brand-new means of providing details to policymakers.

Intelligence experts can also offload recurring and time-consuming jobs to devices to concentrate on the most satisfying work: generating initial and much deeper analysis, increasing the intelligence neighborhood’s overall insights and efficiency. A good example of this is foreign language translation. U.S. intelligence companies invested early in AI-powered capabilities, and the bet has actually paid off. The capabilities of language designs have grown progressively sophisticated and accurate-OpenAI’s just recently released o1 and o3 designs demonstrated considerable development in precision and reasoning ability-and can be used to a lot more quickly translate and summarize text, audio, and video files.

Although challenges remain, future systems trained on greater amounts of non-English information might be capable of discerning subtle distinctions in between dialects and understanding the significance and cultural context of slang or Internet memes. By relying on these tools, the intelligence community might focus on training a cadre of extremely specialized linguists, who can be tough to discover, typically struggle to survive the clearance process, and take a very long time to train. And obviously, by making more foreign language materials available throughout the right agencies, U.S. intelligence services would have the ability to faster triage the mountain of foreign intelligence they get to select out the needles in the haystack that truly matter.

The value of such speed to policymakers can not be ignored. Models can swiftly sift through intelligence information sets, open-source details, and traditional human intelligence and produce draft summaries or preliminary analytical reports that experts can then confirm and refine, making sure the last products are both detailed and precise. Analysts might team up with an innovative AI assistant to resolve analytical issues, test concepts, and brainstorm in a collaborative style, enhancing each version of their analyses and providing finished intelligence faster.

Consider Israel’s experience in January 2018, when its intelligence service, the Mossad, covertly broke into a secret Iranian center and took about 20 percent of the archives that detailed Iran’s nuclear activities in between 1999 and 2003. According to Israeli authorities, the Mossad collected some 55,000 pages of files and a further 55,000 files kept on CDs, consisting of images and videos-nearly all in Farsi. Once the archive was obtained, senior officials positioned enormous pressure on intelligence specialists to produce detailed evaluations of its material and whether it pointed to a continuous effort to construct an Iranian bomb. But it took these experts a number of months-and numerous hours of labor-to translate each page, review it by hand for relevant content, and incorporate that details into assessments. With today’s AI abilities, the first two steps in that process might have been achieved within days, maybe even hours, permitting experts to comprehend and contextualize the intelligence rapidly.

One of the most interesting applications is the method AI might transform how intelligence is consumed by policymakers, enabling them to interact straight with intelligence reports through ChatGPT-like platforms. Such capabilities would permit users to ask specific questions and get summed up, relevant details from thousands of reports with source citations, helping them make informed choices rapidly.

BRAVE NEW WORLD

Although AI offers various benefits, it likewise postures considerable new risks, specifically as enemies develop similar technologies. China’s improvements in AI, particularly in computer system vision and security, threaten U.S. intelligence operations. Because the nation is ruled by an authoritarian routine, it lacks personal privacy constraints and civil liberty defenses. That deficit enables massive information collection practices that have actually yielded data sets of enormous size. Government-sanctioned AI models are trained on vast quantities of personal and behavioral information that can then be utilized for numerous purposes, such as security and social control. The existence of Chinese companies, such as Huawei, in telecoms systems and software around the globe might supply China with ready access to bulk information, especially bulk images that can be used to train facial acknowledgment designs, a particular issue in nations with big U.S. military bases. The U.S. nationwide security neighborhood should consider how Chinese designs built on such extensive data sets can give China a strategic advantage.

And it is not simply China. The expansion of “open source” AI models, such as Meta’s Llama and those created by the French business Mistral AI and the Chinese business DeepSeek, is putting powerful AI abilities into the hands of users around the world at fairly economical expenses. A number of these users are benign, but some are not-including authoritarian regimes, cyber-hackers, and criminal gangs. These malign actors are using big language designs to quickly generate and spread out false and destructive material or to conduct cyberattacks. As witnessed with other intelligence-related innovations, such as signals intercept capabilities and unmanned drones, China, Iran, and Russia will have every reward to share a few of their AI breakthroughs with client states and subnational groups, such as Hezbollah, Hamas, and the Wagner paramilitary company, thereby increasing the threat to the United States and its allies.

The U.S. military and intelligence community’s AI models will become appealing targets for adversaries. As they grow more powerful and main to U.S. nationwide security decision-making, intelligence AIs will become vital nationwide possessions that must be defended against adversaries seeking to jeopardize or manipulate them. The intelligence community must invest in establishing secure AI designs and in developing standards for “red teaming” and continuous assessment to secure against prospective hazards. These teams can utilize AI to replicate attacks, revealing possible weak points and developing strategies to reduce them. Proactive measures, consisting of cooperation with allies on and financial investment in counter-AI technologies, will be necessary.

THE NEW NORMAL

These difficulties can not be wanted away. Waiting too long for AI innovations to totally mature brings its own threats