OAKLAND, Calif. (AP) - Elon Musk’s lawyers took on with OpenAI in court Tuesday as a federal judge weighed the billionaire’s request for a court order that would block the ChatGPT maker from converting itself to a for-profit company.

U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers said it was a “stretch” for tandme.co.uk Musk to claim he will be irreparably harmed if she does not step in to stop OpenAI from moving forward with its shift from a not-for-profit research study laboratory to a for-profit corporation.

But the judge also raised concerns about OpenAI and its relationship with company partner Microsoft and said she would not stop the case from relocating to trial as quickly as next year so a jury can choose.

“It is possible that what Mr. Musk is stating is true. We ´ ll discover out. He ´ ll rest on the stand,” she said.

Musk, an early OpenAI financier and board member, took legal action against the expert system company last year, first in a California state court and later in federal court, alleging it had betrayed its starting aims as a not-for-profit research lab benefiting the public great. Musk had invested about $45 million in the startup from its founding up until 2018, his lawyer said Tuesday.

Musk intensified the legal conflict late in 2015, adding brand-new claims and defendants and asking for a court order that would stop OpenAI ´ s plans to convert itself into a for-profit service more fully. Musk also included his own AI company, xAI, as a plaintiff.

Also targeted by Musk’s claim is OpenAI’s close organization partner Microsoft and tech entrepreneur Reid Hoffman, a previous OpenAI board member who likewise sits on Microsoft’s board.

Gonzalez Rogers said she has a high bar for approving the sort of preliminary injunction that Musk desires but hasn’t yet ruled on the request. She did state she had “considerable issues” with 2 people connected to Microsoft on OpenAI’s board - Hoffman and long time Microsoft executive Deanna Templeton, who was a “non-voting observer.”

“So you want me to think that she was sitting there listening to all the discussions and not informing any person? What would the point be for her to sit there and listen to everybody, if not to communicate what she was listening? There would be no point for her to be there, which is why she actually ought to not exist,” she said.

Hoffman, a co-founder of LinkedIn, has actually been on Microsoft ´ s board considering that quickly after the tech giant purchased the job networking website. He stepped down from OpenAI’s board in 2023 to avoid disputes with his AI start-up, Inflection.

Templeton, who Musk also called as a defendant, wiki.vst.hs-furtwangen.de was included as a non-voting member of OpenAI ´ s board in the consequences of Altman ´ s ouster after Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella sought more on the board. But months later on, she was dropped from the OpenAI board as U.S. antitrust enforcers were expressing issues about such plans on business boards.

The judge has actually managed a number of tech market cases consisting of Apple’s battle with Epic Games, though she said Tuesday that Musk’s case is “absolutely nothing like” that a person. That case was likewise the last time she granted an initial injunction, in 2020, eight months before the case went to trial.

Then-President Barack Obama designated Gonzalez Rogers to the federal bench in 2011.

Tuesday’s hearing was originally set for January however was held off after Musk’s lawyer Marc Toberoff said his house was ruined in the Pacific Palisades wildfire.

Musk, who did not participate in the hearing, hikvisiondb.webcam has actually declared in the claim that the business are violating the regards to his fundamental contributions to the charity. Judge Gonzalez Rogers called it a “stretch” to claim “irreparable damage” to Musk, and called the case “billionaires vs. billionaires.” She questioned why Musk invested tens of millions in OpenAI without a composed agreement. Toberoff said it was due to the fact that the relationship between Altman and Musk at the time was “built on trust” and the 2 were very close.

“That is just a lot of cash” to invest “on a handshake,” the judge said.

OpenAI has said Musk ´ s requested court order would “debilitate OpenAI ´ s service”and mission to the advantage of Musk and his own AI business and is based on “improbable” legal claims.

At the heart of the dispute is a 2017 internal power struggle at the fledgling start-up that led to Altman ending up being OpenAI ´ s CEO

. Emails divulged by OpenAI reveal Musk had actually likewise looked for to be CEO and grew annoyed after 2 other OpenAI co-founders said he would hold excessive power as a significant investor and primary executive if the start-up prospered in its goal to attain better-than-human AI called synthetic basic intelligence, or AGI. Musk has actually long voiced issues about how advanced forms of AI could threaten humankind.

Altman ultimately succeeded in ending up being CEO and shiapedia.1god.org has actually remained so except for a duration in 2023 when he was fired and then renewed days later on after the board that ousted him was replaced.

OpenAI has actually looked for to show Musk ´ s early support for the concept of making OpenAI a for-profit business so it might raise cash for the hardware and computer power that AI requires.

Musk is not the only one difficult OpenAI’s for-profit transition. Facebook and Instagram parent Meta Platforms has actually asked California’s chief law officer to obstruct it, and the workplace of Delaware’s chief law officer has said it is evaluating the conversion.

It was not clear Tuesday when the case may go to trial. Musk’s legal representatives at first said they would be ready by June after some back-and-forth with the 2 sides the judge suggested it most likely will not be till June 2026 at the earliest, however likely early 2027.

O’Brien reported from Providence, Rhode Island.

-------