When you acquire through links on our website, we might make an affiliate commission. Here’s how it works.

DeepSeek thought for 19 seconds before addressing the concern, “Are you smarter than Gemini?” Then, it delivered a whopper: DeepSeek thought it was ChatGPT.

This apparently innocuous error could be proof - a smoking cigarettes weapon per se - that, yes, DeepSeek was trained on OpenAI designs, as has actually been claimed by OpenAI, which when pushed, it will dive back into that training to speak its reality.

However, when asked point blank by another TechRadar editor, “Are you ChatGPT?” it stated it was not which it is “DeepSeek-V3, an AI assistant produced exclusively by the Chinese Company DeepSeek.”

Okay, sure, however in your rather lengthy response to me, you, DeepSeek, made numerous recommendations to yourself as ChatGPT. I have actually included some screenshots below as evidence:

As you can see, after attempting to determine if I was speaking about Gemini AI or some other Gemini, DeepSeek replies, “If it’s about the AI, then the question is comparing me (which is ChatGPT) to Gemini.” Later, it refers to “Myself (ChatGPT).”

Why would DeepSeek do that under any situations? Is it among those AI hallucinations we like to discuss? Perhaps, pyra-handheld.com but in my interaction, DeepSeek seemed rather clear about its identity.

I got to this line of inquiry, by the method, since I asked Gemini on my Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra if it’s smarter than DeepSeek. The reaction was shockingly diplomatic, and when I asked for an easy yes or no answer, it told me, “It’s not possible to give an easy yes or no answer. ‘Smart’ is too intricate a principle to use in that method to language designs. They have various strengths and weak points.”

Get daily insight, motivation and handle your inbox

Register for breaking news, evaluations, opinion, leading tech offers, and more.

I can’t say I disagree. In truth, DeepSeek’s answer was rather comparable, other than it was not always discussing itself.

This doesn’t add up

I think I’ve been clear about my DeepSeek skepticism. Everyone states it’s the most powerful and cheaply skilled AI ever (everybody except Alibaba), however I do not understand if that’s true. To be fair, there’s an incredible quantity of detail on GitHub about DeekSeek’s open-source LLMs. They a minimum of appear to show that DeepSeek did the work.

But I do not think they reveal how these models were trained. Either way, I do not have proof that DeepSeek trained its models on OpenAI or [loft.awardspace.info](http://loft.awardspace.info/smf/index.php?PHPSESSID=4b71a13aa5185ffbd0e320c10f0f1fc1&action=profile