Our new Deepseek based AI Says
Alica Scarborough ha modificato questa pagina 6 mesi fa


Our new Deepseek-based AI states “Chiefs vs Eagles? … How Predictable”

Super Bowl predictions from our brand-new Deepseek-based AI trained to be better at forecasting

Share this post

Nobody can forecast the future however at Lightning arrester Labs we are training AI to give it its best shot. With as much as date news and a little however lively 14 Billion specification model, our AI is boldly forecasting the unforeseeable. Join us as we attempt to answer humanity’s hardest concerns.

Super Bowl Sunday is almost upon us and, just as 2 years earlier, we have the Chiefs against the Eagles. The spread currently sits at Chiefs -1.5 with an over-under of 48.5. While the statistics are well studied, there remain many pushing concerns that are less easy to select. Our company, Lightning Rod Labs, has actually been mining questions from locations like polymarket.com and training a large language model to be much better at forecasting the future (and have seen some interesting improvements - term paper incoming). This week we turned its cold, calculating eye at the Super Bowl to see if it can offer us some insight into the finer points of what we can expect this Sunday.

For more updates from the AI world register for my newsletter!

Background

Our AI is a 14 billion criterion model which is really on the smaller sized side. (Some estimates recommend ChatGPT has 1.8 TRILLION parameters and trained utilizing 8000 H100 GPUs. We utilized 8.) Additionally, its understanding cutoff is from many months ago so we have actually developed an “agentic pipeline” to do news retrieval, summarization, and ranking. With each question we offer the news and watch as the AI reasons its way through unidentified territory to make its best prediction possible.

And Now … The Important Questions

We presented the following concerns to our AI and evaluated its reaction. While we have seen prediction enhancements from our training, utilize these estimates for wiki.dulovic.tech prop wagering at your own danger.

Will Travis Kelce propose to Taylor Swift after the Super Bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 5% possibility

And so it appears this Sunday will not be a romantic one. Our AI believes Taylor and Travis’ relationship is rock strong, but a little too private for wiki.myamens.com a post-Super Bowl proposition. Plus got ta consider if the Chiefs lose. That would be an uncomfortable proposal …

First, I’ll take a look at the essential points from the posts. Travis has actually remained in a relationship with Taylor considering that 2023. He’s a huge football star, and she’s been helpful of his profession, attending his games. They seem to have a strong, raovatonline.org public relationship, and Taylor has actually even welcomed her pals and family to the Super Bowl, revealing her dedication.

Some fans are delighted, while others, specifically Swifties, are a bit uncertain, particularly provided remarks Travis made about Donald Trump attending the Super Bowl. That has actually caused some Swifties to question how appropriate Travis is for Taylor. However, the couple appears to be keeping their relationship personal and not addressing the speculation straight.

I believe the key points are the speculation and his incredibly elusive responses. While he’s plainly in a relationship and the Super Bowl is an essential occasion, the odds and his responses suggest it’s more of a possibility instead of a certainty. I ’d estimate a low possibility, maybe around 5%, thinking about all aspects.

Will the Eagles do more than 5 “tush-pushes” throughout the very bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 79% chance

No Jason Kelce hasn’t stopped the Eagles from using their signature “tush-push” relocation, now its just a different front-tush being pushed. Will an AI understand what a “tush-push” is? Does an AI even know what a “tush” is? Will it consider that the Chiefs stopped (controversy aside) Josh Allen’s comparable efforts? Appears like our AI believes they’ll be utilizing Jalen Hurts 600-pound squat and strong legs and lower body (Does our AI have a crush on Jalen Hurts?) time and again throughout this game.

Alright, I’m attempting to figure out the likelihood that the Eagles will do more than 5 “tush-pushes” during the Super Bowl. First, I require to understand what precisely a “tush-push” is. From the short articles, it appears like it’s a technique where the quarterback, in this case Jalen Hurts, uses his legs and lower body strength to press off defenders. It’s compared to pressing a heavy box, so it’s a physical maneuver that needs strength and method.

Article 3 dives into the physics of the “tush-push.” It explains how Hurts uses his leg strength, having done a 600-pound squat, to carry out the move. The post discusses that the Eagles have a 90% success rate with this method, which is pretty high. … I likewise need to think about the protective methods of the Chiefs. If the Chiefs understand the Eagles’ “tush-push” strategy, setiathome.berkeley.edu they might adjust their defense accordingly, which could either increase or reduce the number of times the Eagles use it.

Considering that more than 5 appears like a significant number however possible provided their confidence, I would estimate a likelihood around 60-70% possibility. This represents their preparation, confidence in the technique, and the likelihood that they’ll use it several times, especially if it works early on.

Will Kendrick Lamar diss Donald Trump throughout the halftime show efficiency?

AI Final Prediction: 65% chance

While our AI might not resemble us when it pertains to awareness, a soul, or any physical manifestation, it certainly has opinions on Kendrick Lamar. It was quite uncertain, waffling backward and forward, however in the end it thinks Kendrick isn’t going to pull back from a fight.

From the short articles, I see that Kendrick Lamar has a history of slamming Trump. He’s done this in his songs, like “The Heart Part 4,” and even made a declaration throughout a previous halftime program when Trump existed in 2018. That appears substantial due to the fact that it shows he’s done it before, so perhaps he’ll do it again. But wait, looking at more current posts, it mentions that Lamar is moving away from political declarations and focusing more on individual expression. That could suggest he’s less likely to address Trump this time.

However, he’s also associated with a feud with Drake, which may provide him factors to make some public statements, even if they’re not political. Another point is the legal concerns surrounding his track “Not Like Us.” There’s a defamation suit from Drake, so maybe he’s careful about consisting of any questionable tunes in the performance. But since he won the Grammys for that track, he might still wish to perform it, even if it’s uncertain.

Considering Trump is attending this Super Bowl, which is a prominent occasion, Lamar may feel obliged to make a declaration. However, the NFL tends to prevent political declarations during the halftime program, so there’s a risk that such material might be restricted or softened.

On the other hand, Lamar has a performance history of making strong proceed huge stages. He’s the very first solo rap act to heading the halftime program, which might give him more innovative liberty. Plus, his previous habits suggests he’s not shy about expressing his opinions, even in public performances.

But I likewise keep in mind reading that Lamar revealed tiredness about criticizing Trump, comparing it to beating a dead horse. That might indicate he’s less motivated to raise Trump this time around, especially if he’s concentrating on his fight with Drake. In summary, weighing all factors-past habits, current shifts in focus, legal concerns, and the event’s context-the likelihood appears to be reasonably high, maybe around 65%.

Will Andy Reid eat a cheeseburger on screen after the incredibly bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 25% opportunity

Lets be honest, Andy Reid loves cheeseburgers. And who does not? Will the truth that our AI has never ever tasted the juicy deliciousness of a fresh burger taint its prediction? Looks like theres rather of a possibility that if the chiefs taste success, Andy will taste Angus Beef.

From the short articles, I see that Terry Bradshaw made a joke about Andy Reid consuming a cheeseburger throughout a Super Bowl celebration. Bradshaw later on said sorry for the joke, saying he didn’t suggest to trigger offense and that he in fact discovered it amusing himself. Reid appeared to take it in stride, which might suggest he’s the type to laugh it off rather than getting upset.

Looking at the short articles, it points out that Andy Reid is a food lover and enjoys cheeseburgers. There’s a post specifically about his love for food, which recommends that he’s a person who delights in eating, particularly with his team. So, if there were plans to commemorate after the Super Bowl, it’s possible he would take part in a cheeseburger, specifically if the situation is on screen for an event.

Will the opening coin toss in the Super Bowl be tails?

AI Final Prediction: 50% opportunity

“Tails never fails?” You can’t fool the machines !! Betters leading up to the superbowl have actually been anticipating the coin toss and 53% are anticipating heads due to it being heads 3 of the last 4 very bowls. Potentially profitable? Maybe. Statistically incongruent? Certainly. Luckily our AI can’t be deceived and believes anything can occur when that coin enters the air.

Okay, so I’m trying to determine the probability that the opening coin toss in the Super Bowl will be tails. I understand that a coin toss is expected to be 50/50, but there’s some historic data that may influence this prediction.

First, I check out through the posts provided. They all discuss the historic statistics of Super Bowl coin tosses. It looks like tails has shown up more frequently than heads historically. Specifically, in 58 Super Bowls, tails has been the result 30 times, which has to do with 52%, while heads has been 28 times, which has to do with 48%. So, based purely on history, tails has a small edge, however it’s not a substantial difference.

However, I remember that the outcome of a coin toss is usually thought about random. The slight historic edge for tails could be due to opportunity. But when making predictions, sometimes individuals weigh historic data even if it’s not statistically considerable. So, I ought to consider whether this historic bias should affect the possibility.

After considering it, I decide that while the historical data shows a slight choice for tails, it’s not statistically substantial sufficient to move the possibility far from 0.5. So, I’ll opt for 0.5 as the probability, acknowledging that the slight historic edge exists but does not bypass the fact that each toss is an independent 50/50 event.

Will the referees cheat to help the Chiefs win the Super Bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 1% chance

We get it, you think the refs like Patrick Mahomes and are gon na assist him win. If I wasn’t born and raised in Kansas City (I assure we didn’t inject pro-Kansas City training data) I would most likely think the very same. BUT, its authorities now since our AI says the opportunities are just 1% (hmmmm … 1% is still type of high when it pertains to scams on a national scale). Looks like the Chiefs will have to win fair and square!

AI Reasoning:

Okay, so I’m attempting to figure out the likelihood that the referees will cheat to help the Chiefs win the Super Bowl. Hmm, that’s a quite serious accusation. Let me break this down. First, I’m seeing a great deal of articles that talk about conspiracy theories referees are biased towards the Chiefs. People are pointing to some doubtful employ current video games, especially the AFC Championship Game. That does appear to trigger some uncertainty. I can see why fans may get annoyed when their team loses due to what they view as bad officiating.

But then I check out that the NFL Referees Association and the Commissioner, Roger Goodell, have both dismissed these claims as “preposterous” and “ridiculous.” They state there’s no evidence of organized predisposition. That’s a strong declaration from the people in charge. If they’re rejecting it, it may suggest there’s no real basis or they would have resolved it differently if there was some fact to it.

Looking at the posts, numerous sources like [1], [5], [6], [7], [8], and [9] all report that the officials are against these claims, and some even called them insulting. They likewise discussed that statistical analysis does not reveal any pattern of favoritism towards the Chiefs. For example, Mike Pereira from FOX said data reveals the Chiefs have actually been penalized more because 2022. That’s intriguing due to the fact that if they were getting special treatment, you might expect less charges, right?



So, putting all of it together, the possibility that referees will cheat to help the Chiefs win the Super Bowl is probably extremely low. Maybe not zero due to the fact that you can’t eliminate every possibility, however incredibly unlikely.

Summary

There you have it everyone, is it even worth seeing the video game still? I guess I’ll have to wait and see how the game turns out before we release this upon the stock market. Fingers crossed for disgaeawiki.info an excellent game! And hi, if it turns out our AI was wrong about everything, at least it can gain from this.